4.7 Article

Rockfall forecasting and risk management along a major transportation corridor in the Alps through ground-based radar interferometry

Journal

LANDSLIDES
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages 1425-1435

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-019-01190-y

Keywords

Rockfall; GBInSAR; Early-warning; Tertiary creep; Failure-time prediction

Funding

  1. Italian National Civil Protection Department (DPC)
  2. Regional Agency for Environmental Protection of the Lombardia Region (ARPA-Lombardia)
  3. ARPA-Lombardia
  4. DPC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rockfalls are a recurrent cause of disruption for transportation corridors running along the bottom of U-shaped alpine valleys. In some scenarios, risk may effectively be reduced only by implementing an early-warning system able to give notice of incipient failures on the slope. This paper describes a successful example of rockfall forecasting and risk management in proximity of the Gallivaggio sanctuary (San Giacomo Valley, Central Italian Alps). Since 2016, a Ground-Based Synthetic Aperture Radar continuously monitored a roughly 500-m high, sub-vertical granitic slope. Monitoring data evidenced the presence and continued movement of a similar to 5000 m3 highly unstable mass, having a projected fall trajectory directly threatening the sanctuary and the adjacent segment of a national road. Traffic and access to the sanctuary were regulated by a sequence of alert thresholds, and restrictive orders were issued according to the activity of the instability. The rock mass eventually fell, and the failure-time was accurately predicted several hours in advance. Despite damage to both the road and buildings, the timely evacuation of the area prevented any loss of life. The case study provides a reference framework to better manage rockfall risk in areas where the installation of adequate protective barriers is not technically feasible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available