4.7 Article

Characteristics of failure area and failure mechanism of a bedding rockslide in Libo County, Guizhou, China

Journal

LANDSLIDES
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages 1367-1374

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-019-01188-6

Keywords

Bedding rockslide; Field investigation; Step-path failure mode; Instability mechanism; Slope excavation; Rainfall

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51478477, 51878668]
  2. Guizhou Provincial Department of Transportation Foundation [2014122006, 2017122058]
  3. program of China Scholarship Council
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University [2017zzts199]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Owing to the continuous rainfall, a bedding rockslide occurred at a construction site on the San-Li highway (Sandu County to Libo County) at 18:05 (UTC+8) on September 23, 2017, in Libo County, Guizhou Province, China. This bedding rockslide caused three deaths, six injuries, and an accumulation zone of approximately 1.8x10(5)m(3) of medium weathered limestone that blocked the main line of the M ramp. To explore the triggering factors of this rockslide, the engineering geological condition, hydrogeological condition, slope excavation scheme, and statistics of rainfall data were investigated based on field investigations and geophysical drilling. The blasting failure of the upper unstable and dangerous rock masses after the bedding rockslide was analyzed. Three instability behaviors characteristics are distinguished: (1) the bedding characteristics of the rock formation and weak interlayer, (2) the steep slope (the largest dip angle being 46 degrees), and (3) the appearance of the free face induced by the slope excavation. The results indicate that the above conditions are objective factors, and continuous rainfall triggers the bedding rockslide. The landslide follows the step-path failure mode.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available