4.4 Article

Antibacterial Effects of Phytic Acid against Foodborne Pathogens and Investigation of Its Mode of Action

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION
Volume 82, Issue 5, Pages 826-833

Publisher

INT ASSOC FOOD PROTECTION
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-418

Keywords

Antimicrobial activity; Cell membrane; Ethanol; Foodborne pathogens; Phytic acid; Synergistic antimicrobial

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University of Shaanxi Normal University, China [GK201803067, GK201601007]
  2. Science and Technology Innovation as a Whole Plan Projects of Shaanxi Province, China [2016KTCL02-33]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the antimicrobial mechanism of phytic acid (PA) and its antibacterial effects in combination with ethanol. The MIC of PA on Escherichia coli ATCC 11229, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538P, Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633, and Salmonella Typhimurium CICC 27483 were 0.24, 0.20, 0.26, and 0.28% (w/w), respectively. E. coli ATCC 11229 and S. aureus ATCC 6538P were selected to investigate the mechanism of PA by analyzing its effects at 1/2MIC and at MIC on the cell morphology, intracellular ATP, and cell membrane integrity. Environmental scanning electron microscope images revealed that PA was able to change the cell morphology and disrupt the intercellular adhesion. PA retarded bacterial growth and caused cell membrane dysfunction, which was accompanied by decreased intracellular ATP concentrations. Flow cytometry analysis further revealed that almost all the bacterial cells were damaged after treatment with PA at its MIC for 2 h. Moreover, PA has a synergistic antimicrobial ability when used in combination with ethanol. These results suggested that PA is effective in inhibiting growth of foodborne pathogens mainly by the mechanism of cell membrane damage and to provide a theoretical basis for the development of natural antimicrobial agents in the food industry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available