4.2 Article

The Trends of Pediatric Facial Fractures Due to Violence in a Level One Trauma Population

Journal

JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY
Volume 30, Issue 7, Pages 1970-1973

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005613

Keywords

Assault; facial fracture; mandible; pediatric; trauma; violence

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Pediatric facial fractures due to intentionally violent mechanisms represent a unique subset of facial fractures. The objective of our research is to identify how violence affects patterns of facial fractures and their management in pediatric patients. Methods: An IRB approved, retrospective study of our institution's pediatric patients <= 18 years of age who presented with >= 1 facial fracture due to violence from January 2006 to December 2015 was performed. Violence was defined as trauma intended to hurt another or self. Demographics, fractures, mechanism, concomitant injuries, and management were analyzed. Results: The 1274 patients were diagnosed with facial fractures, with 235 of these due to violence (18%). These patients of violence (POV) had 332 fractures, with an average fracture per patient of 1.4 +/- .0.8. The majority (86%) were male, Non-Hispanic African American (35%), and the average age was 15.9 +/- 2.8 years. The most common fracture was the mandible (50% of patients) and most common mechanism was assault (76%). The POV were older, male, and of minority race/ethnic groups when compared to patients of non-violence (PONV) (P<0.01). The POV presented with fewer concomitant injuries, were less likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit, and more often surgically managed when compared to the PONV (P<0.01). Conclusion: This study represents the largest US, single institution, Level 1 trauma center study of pediatric facial fractures. Pediatric patients with facial fractures due to a violent mechanism represent a distinct category of trauma patients with a unique profile of injuries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available