4.4 Article

The Functional Role of Response Suppression during an Urge to Relieve Pain

Journal

JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 31, Issue 9, Pages 1404-1421

Publisher

MIT PRESS
DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01423

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [DA026452]
  2. James S. McDonnell Foundation [220020375]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Being in the state of having both a strong impulse to act and a simultaneous need to withhold is commonly described as an urge. Although urges are part of everyday life and also important to several clinical disorders, the components of urge are poorly understood. It has been conjectured that withholding an action during urge involves active response suppression. We tested that idea by designing an urge paradigm that required participants to resist an impulse to press a button and gain relief from heat (one hand was poised to press while the other arm had heat stimulation). We first used paired-pulse TMS over motor cortex (M1) to measure corticospinal excitability of the hand that could press for relief, while participants withheld movement. We observed increased short-interval intracortical inhibition, an index of M1 GABAergic interneuron activity that was maintained across seconds and specific to the task-relevant finger. A second experiment replicated this. We next used EEG to better image putative cortical signatures of motor suppression and pain. We found increased sensorimotor beta contralateral to the task-relevant hand while participants withheld the movement during heat. We interpret this as further evidence of a motor suppressive process. Additionally, there was beta desynchronization contralateral to the arm with heat, which could reflect a pain signature. Strikingly, participants who suppressed more exhibited less of a putative pain response. We speculate that, during urge, a suppressive state may have functional relevance for both resisting a prohibited action and for mitigating discomfort.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available