4.6 Article

Pathogenic tau does not drive activation of the unfolded protein response

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 294, Issue 25, Pages 9679-9688

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.008263

Keywords

neuron; Tau protein; tauopathy; transgenic mice; unfolded protein response (UPR); neurodegenerative disease; protein misfolding; frontotemporal dementia; primary hippocampal neuron

Funding

  1. Alzheimer's Society
  2. Healthcare Management Trust [AS-PhD-2015-029]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The unfolded protein response (UPR) is commonly associated with a range of neurodegenerative diseases, and targeting UPR components has been suggested as a therapeutic strategy. The UPR surveys protein folding within the endoplasmic reticulum. However, many of the misfolded proteins that accumulate in neurodegeneration are localized so that they do not directly cause endoplasmic reticulum triggers that activate this pathway. Here, using a transgenic mouse model and primary cell cultures along with quantitative PCR, immunoblotting, and immunohistochemistry, we tested whether the UPR is induced in in vivo and in vitro murine models of tauopathy that are based on expression of mutant tau(P301L). We found no evidence for the UPR in the rTg4510 mouse model, in which mutant tau is transgenically expressed under the control of tetracycline-controlled transactivator protein. This observation was supported by results from acute experiments in which neuronal cultures expressed mutant tau and accumulated misfolded cytoplasmic tau aggregates but exhibited no UPR activation. These results suggest that the UPR is not induced as a response to tau misfolding and aggregation despite clear evidence for progressive cellular dysfunction and degeneration. We propose that caution is needed when evaluating the implied significance of the UPR as a critical determinant across major neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available