4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Experimental study on self-acceleration characteristics of unstable flame of low calorific value gas blended with hydrogen

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 44, Issue 36, Pages 25248-25256

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.141

Keywords

Flame self-acceleration; Low calorific value gas; Flame instability; Hydrogen

Funding

  1. National Key RAMP
  2. D Program of China [2018YFB0105500]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The self-acceleration characteristics of cellular flame of low calorific value (LCV) gas in a constant volume combustion bomb were studied, the propagation process of spherical flame with different hydrogen (H-2) addition and initial pressure was analyzed, and the flame radius versus time was also discussed. The experimental results show that the self-acceleration of the cellular flame of LCV gas blended with hydrogen appears at high pressure, high hydrogen ratio and lean burn. The acceleration index increases with the increase of hydrogen addition and the reduction of equivalence ratio, and increases with the increase of initial pressure, but the acceleration index does not infinitely increase with the increase of initial pressure. With the increase of the hydrogen addition and the reduction of the equivalence ratio, the critical radius of the cellular flame decreases, which is shown that increase of the hydrogen addition and the lean burn will make appearance of cellular flame in advance. When the ratio of hydrogen is less than 60%, the critical Peclet number decreases with increase of hydrogen addition, when the ratio of hydrogen continues to increase to 80%, it increases slightly. The research in this paper provides an experimental basis for the in-depth study of engine combustion of LCV gas blended with hydrogen. (C) 2019 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available