4.7 Article

Study of morphological characteristics on hydrophilicity-enhanced SiO2/Nafion composite membranes by using multimode atomic force microscopy

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue 9, Pages 4157-4169

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/er.4528

Keywords

air-breathing proton exchange membrane fuel cells (AB-PEMFCs); composite membranes; dynamic mode atomic force microscopy (DMAFM); electrostatic force microscopy; liquid and solid interface analysis; proton exchange membrane; water clustering

Funding

  1. DGIST R&D Program of the Ministry of Science and ICT [18-IT-02, 2018010015]
  2. Ministry of Science & ICT (MSIT), Republic of Korea [18-IT-02] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Air-breathing proton exchange membrane fuel cells (AB-PEMFCs) have a great potential for commercialization owing to their simple mechanical configuration and low cost compared with traditional proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). However, AB-PEMFCs perform worse than traditional PEMFCs owing to the omission of the humidifier and a poor air supply system. In this study, hygroscopic metal oxide materials with good water absorption characteristics were employed in a Nafion membrane without humidification to compensate for the lack of performance owing to low proton conductivity. Among the various metal oxide materials, mesoporous structured silica has been synthesized with Nafion to increase the water content in nonhumidified conditions. The local morphological variation and surface charge distribution on the pristine Nafion and SiO2/Nafion composite membranes were analyzed by using multimode atomic force microscopy and force distance analyses. Several remarkable results were revealed, including considerable morphological changes and a locally separated water cluster network structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available