4.1 Article

Exosomes populate the cerebrospinal fluid of preterm infants with post-haemorrhagic hydrocephalus

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2019.01.004

Keywords

Exosome; Preterm infant; Cerebrospinal fluid; Intraventricular hemorrhage; Cerebral palsy; Micro RNA

Funding

  1. David Telling Charitable Foundation
  2. Elizabeth Blackwell Institute for Health Research, University of Bristol
  3. Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund
  4. Castang Foundation
  5. BBSRC [BB/R017883/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Preterm infants are at risk of germinal matrix haemorrhage-intraventricular haemorrhage (GMHIVH) which leads to post-haemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH) in 30% of infants; this is associated with moderate severe neurodevelopmental impairment and confers significant risk of cerebral palsy. There are however no predictive indicators of the severity or long-term outcome after GMH-IVH. In recent years, endosome-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) or exosomes have been isolated from biofluids and shown to mediate intercellular communication via selective enrichment in proteins and micro-RNAs. Methods: This study aimed to isolate and characterise EVs from the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of 3 preterm infants with PHH using nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) with immunogold protein labelling, and micro-RNA analysis. Results: NTA of unaltered CSF revealed a heterogeneous and dynamic population of EVs. Exosomal-sized EVs were isolated by differential ultracentrifugation and TEM confirmed the presence of CD63(+) and CD81(+) exosomes. The micro-RNAs miR-9, miR-17, miR-26a, miR-124 and miR-1911 were detected within the exosome-enriched fraction and profiled over time. Conclusion: This is the first reported characterisation of exosomes from the CSF of preterm infants with posthaemorrhagic hydrocephalus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available