4.3 Article

rs1501299 Polymorphism in the Adiponectin Gene and Their Association with Total Adiponectin Levels, Insulin Resistance and Metabolic Syndrome in Obese Subjects

Journal

ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM
Volume 69, Issue 3-4, Pages 226-231

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000453401

Keywords

rs1501299; Adiponectin gene; ADIPOQ; Adipokines; Metabolic syndrome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Aims: The aim of this study was to determine the association of single nucleotide polymorphism rs1501299 in the ADIPOQ gene with body weight, insulin resistance, serum adipokine levels and metabolic syndrome (MetS). Methods: The study involved a population of 1,007 adult obese subjects. Parameters like body weight, fat mass, waist circumferences, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, C-reactive protein, insulin concentration, homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), lipid profile and adipocytokines levels (leptin, adiponectin and resistin) were all measured. The genotype of ADIPOQ gene polymorphism (rs1501299) was evaluated. Results: Insulin levels (GG: 13.6 +/- 5.1 mUI/l vs. GT: 14.1 +/- 5.2 mUI/l vs. TT: 16.6 +/- 5.2 mUI/l; p < 0.05) and HOMA-IR (GG: 3.3 +/- 1.5 units vs. GT: 4.1 +/- 1.1 units vs. TT: 4.5 +/- 1.3 units; p < 0.05) were higher in T-allele carriers than they were in non-T-allele carriers. Total adiponectin levels (GG: 20.2 +/- 2.4 ng/dl vs. GT: 15.8 +/- 3.4 ng/dl vs. TT: 13.7 +/- 1.4 ng/dl; p < 0.05) were lower in T-allele carriers than they were in non-T-allele carriers. Logistic regression analysis indicated that subjects with T allele were associated with an increased risk of MetS (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.08-1.25, p = 0.033) and an increased risk of hyperglycemia (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.37-2.55, p = 0.028) after adjusting by age and gender. Conclusions: These data suggest an important role of this ADIPOQ variant at position +276 on insulin resistance, total adiponectin levels and MetS. (C) 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available