Dose response of task-specific upper limb training in people at least 6 months poststroke: A phase II, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Dose response of task-specific upper limb training in people at least 6 months poststroke: A phase II, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 80, Issue 3, Pages 342-354
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2016-07-22
DOI
10.1002/ana.24734
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Quantifying Change During Outpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Regression Analysis
- (2016) Keith Lohse et al. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
- Dose of arm activity training during acute and subacute rehabilitation post stroke: a systematic review of the literature
- (2015) Kathryn S Hayward et al. CLINICAL REHABILITATION
- Dose and timing in neurorehabilitation
- (2015) Catherine E. Lang et al. CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY
- Dose-response relationships using brain–computer interface technology impact stroke rehabilitation
- (2015) Brittany M. Young et al. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
- Efficacy and safety of very early mobilisation within 24 h of stroke onset (AVERT): a randomised controlled trial
- (2015) LANCET
- Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke
- (2015) Gert Kwakkel et al. LANCET NEUROLOGY
- Is More Better? Using Metadata to Explore Dose–Response Relationships in Stroke Rehabilitation
- (2014) Keith R. Lohse et al. STROKE
- The Brain Recovery Core
- (2013) Catherine E. Lang et al. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy
- Assessment of upper extremity impairment, function, and activity after stroke: foundations for clinical decision making
- (2012) Catherine E. Lang et al. Journal of Hand Therapy
- Body-Weight–Supported Treadmill Rehabilitation after Stroke
- (2011) Pamela W. Duncan et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Importance of Specificity, Amount, and Intensity of Locomotor Training to Improve Ambulatory Function in Patients Poststroke
- (2011) T. George Hornby et al. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
- Robot-Assisted Therapy for Long-Term Upper-Limb Impairment after Stroke
- (2010) Albert C. Lo et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Dose-Response Relation Between Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Upper-Extremity Function in Patients With Stroke
- (2010) Shu-Shyuan Hsu et al. STROKE
- Is the Posner Reaction Time Test More Accurate Than Clinical Tests in Detecting Left Neglect in Acute and Chronic Stroke?
- (2009) Jennifer Rengachary et al. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
- Observation of Amounts of Movement Practice Provided During Stroke Rehabilitation
- (2009) Catherine E. Lang et al. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
- Do people with acquired brain impairment benefit from additional therapy specifically directed at the hand? A randomized controlled trial
- (2009) Leo F Ross et al. CLINICAL REHABILITATION
- Very Early Constraint-Induced Movement during Stroke Rehabilitation (VECTORS): A single-center RCT
- (2009) A. W. Dromerick et al. NEUROLOGY
- A Self-Administered Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) Improves Arm Function During Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation
- (2009) Jocelyn E. Harris et al. STROKE
- Locomotor Training Improves Daily Stepping Activity and Gait Efficiency in Individuals Poststroke Who Have Reached a “Plateau” in Recovery
- (2009) Jennifer L. Moore et al. STROKE
- Estimating Minimal Clinically Important Differences of Upper-Extremity Measures Early After Stroke
- (2008) Catherine E. Lang et al. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started