4.7 Article

Impact of elagolix treatment on fatigue experienced by women with moderate to severe pain associated with endometriosis

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 112, Issue 2, Pages 298-+

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.02.031

Keywords

Endometriosis; fatigue; elagolix; gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist

Funding

  1. Abbvie

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of elagolix, an oral GnRH antagonist, for the reduction of fatigue in women with moderate or severe endometriosis-associated pain. Design: Randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Setting: Clinics. Patient(s): A total of 860 women treated with elagolix or placebo. Intervention(s): Women received either elagolix at 150 mg daily (QD) orally, elagolix at 200 mg twice daily (BID) orally, or placebo. Main Outcome Measure(s): Change from baseline to month 1, 3, and 6 visits, in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form 6a questionnaire T-scores. Results(s): At baseline, 54%-74% of women with moderate to severe pain associated with endometriosis reported having fatigue-related issues quite a bit'' or very much,'' depending on the question asked. Fatigue extent was reduced to 29%-43% and 14%-29% for women treated with elagolix at 150 mg QD and 200 mg BID, respectively, at 6 months, compared with 35%-50% with placebo. The resultant decrease in fatigue T-scores was significant after elagolix treatment compared with placebo at 6 months, with changes of -2.21 and -5.90 with elagolix at 150 mg QD and 200 mg BID, respectively. Significant reduction in fatigue scores were observed among patients reporting clinically meaningful response reduction'' in dysmenorrhea, nonmenstrual pelvic pain, and dyspareunia (-7.31, -6.62, and -4.31, respectively) compared with nonresponders. Conclusion(s): In women with moderate to severe endometriosis related pain, elagolix significantly reduces fatigue levels. ((C) 2019 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available