4.6 Review

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEACAM) family members and Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Journal

CYTOKINE & GROWTH FACTOR REVIEWS
Volume 47, Issue -, Pages 21-31

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2019.05.008

Keywords

Inflammatory bowel disease; Carcinoembroyonic antigen; Adherent-InvasiveEscherichia Coli; Epithelial cells; Bacteria

Funding

  1. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [SFI/12/RC/2273]
  2. SFI [SFI/15/RP/2828]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is a chronic intestinal inflammatory condition with increasing incidence worldwide and whose pathogenesis remains largely unknown. The collected evidence indicates that genetic, environmental and microbial factors and a dysregulated immune response are responsible for the disease. IBD has an early onset and long term sufferers present a higher risk of developing colitis associated cancer (CAC). The carcinoembryonic antigen-related adhesion molecules (CEACAM) are a subgroup of the CEA family, found in a range of different cell types and organs including epithelial cells in the intestine. They can act as intercellular adhesions molecules for e. g. bacteria and soluble antigens. CEACAMs are involved in a number of different processes including cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation and tumour suppression. Some CEACAMs such as CEACAM1, CEACAM5 and CEACAM6 are highly associated with cancer and are even recognised as valid clinical markers for certain cancer forms. However, their role in IBD pathogenesis is less understood. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive summary of published literature on CEACAMs and intestinal inflammation (IBD). The interactions between CEACAMs and bacteria adhesion in relation to IBD pathophysiology will be addressed and potential new therapeutic and diagnostic opportunities will be identified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available