4.3 Review

From HDL-cholesterol to HDL-function: cholesterol efflux capacity determinants

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN LIPIDOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages 101-107

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000589

Keywords

cardiovascular risk; cholesterol efflux capacity; HDL; HDL function; HDL proteome

Funding

  1. Amarin
  2. AstraZeneca
  3. DalCor
  4. Esperion
  5. Ionis
  6. Pfizer
  7. Sanofi
  8. Servier

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review The validity of HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) elevation as a therapeutic target has been questioned, in comparison to enhancing HDL functionality. Cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) is an in-vitro assay that measures the ability of an individual's HDL to promote cholesterol efflux from cholesterol donor cells such as macrophages. CEC of HDL is a predictor of cardiovascular risk independent of HDL-C levels. However, molecular determinants of CEC and the effects of diseases and therapeutic interventions on CEC have not been completely defined. Recent findings We review here recent findings on elevated HDL-C and disease risk, as well as determinants of CEC, from genetics and proteomics to pathophysiology and therapeutic interventions that contribute to our understanding of CEC as a biomarker of HDL functionality. Summary Elevated HDL-C levels are not always protective against cardiovascular disease and mortality. CEC is a heritable trait, and genetic polymorphisms in genes involved in HDL and triglycerides metabolism are associated with CEC. Multiple HDL proteins correlate positively with CEC levels and inversely with noncalcified plaque burden. Differences in CEC assays that make comparisons between studies difficult are also emphasized. CEC should be measured in clinical trials of lipid-modifying and anti-inflammatory therapies to determine whether increases are cardioprotective.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available