4.3 Article

Retinal Tissue Perfusion in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Journal

CURRENT EYE RESEARCH
Volume 44, Issue 10, Pages 1091-1097

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2019.1612444

Keywords

Retinal tissue perfusion (RTP); multiple sclerosis; retinal blood flow volume; retinal tissue volume

Categories

Funding

  1. National Multiple Sclerosis Society [RG-1506-04890]
  2. NIH Center Grant [P30 EY014801]
  3. Research to Prevent Blindness (RPB)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The goal of this work was to determine whether the retinal tissue perfusion (RTP) is impaired in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods: Seventy-four patients [66 relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and 8 clinically isolated syndrome (CIS)] and 74 age- and gender-matched healthy controls were recruited. RTP was calculated as the retinal blood flow (measured using retinal function imager) supplying the macular area divided by the corresponding tissue volume of the inner retina from the inner limiting membrane to the outer plexiform layer, as measured by ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. Results: The RTP in the MS group was 2.37 +/- 0.59 nl/s/mm(3) (mean +/- standard deviation), which was significantly lower than the control group (4.06 +/- 0.89 nl/s/mm(3), P < .001), reflecting a decrease of 42%. The blood flow volume was 2.50 +/- 0.50 nl/s in MS, which was 45% lower than in the control group (4.56 +/- 0.91 nl/s, P < .001). In addition, the tissue volume of the inner retina was significantly lower than in the control group (P < .05). The RTP in patients with MS was significantly correlated with the retinal blood flow volume (r = 0.84, P < .001) and retinal tissue volume (r = -0.56, P < .001). However, the retinal blood flow in patients with MS was not related to the tissue volume (r = -0.06, P = .59). Conclusions: Impaired retinal tissue perfusion occurred in patients with MS, which could be developed as a possible biomarker in monitoring disease progression in MS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available