4.5 Article

Ecology of Prognathodes obliquus, a butterflyfish endemic to mesophotic ecosystems of St. Peter and St. Paul's Archipelago

Journal

CORAL REEFS
Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages 955-960

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00338-019-01822-8

Keywords

Chaetodontidae; Diet; Deep reefs; Microplastics; Mid-Atlantic Ridge; St. Paul's Rocks

Funding

  1. Fontes Hipertermicas do Arquipelago de Sao Pedro e Sao Paulo (SISBIO) [58069-1]
  2. Programa de Monitoramento de Longa Duracao das Comunidades Recifais de Ilhas Oceanicas-PELD/ILOC [CNPq 403740/2012-6]
  3. Programa Arquipelago [CNPq 557185/2009-2, 405386/2012-5]
  4. FAPESP [2015/24408-4]
  5. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brazil (CAPES)
  6. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [15/24408-4] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chaetodontidae is among the most conspicuous families of fishes in tropical and subtropical coral and rocky reefs. Most ecological studies focus in the genus Chaetodon, while Prognathodes remains poorly understood. Here we provide the first account on the ecology of Prognathodes obliquus, a butterflyfish endemic to St. Peter and St. Paul's Archipelago (SPSPA), Mid-Atlantic Ridge. We studied the depth distribution and foraging behaviour of P. obliquus through technical diving, remote-operated vehicles and submarines. Also, we characterized its diet by analysing stomach contents. Prognathodes obliquus is mostly found below 40 m, with abundance peaking between 90 and 120 m and deepest record to date at 155 m. It forages mostly over sediment, epilithic algal matrix and complex bottoms formed by fused polychaete tubes, preying mostly upon polychaetes, crustaceans, hydroids and bryozoans. Branching black corals were rarely consumed and used mostly as refuge. In conclusion, P. obliquus is a generalist invertebrate feeder typical of mesophotic ecosystems of SPSPA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available