4.6 Article

Qigesan reduces the motility of esophageal cancer cells via inhibiting Gas6/Axl and NF-κB expression

Journal

BIOSCIENCE REPORTS
Volume 39, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BSR20190850

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Hebei dysphagia Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine (Hebei, China)
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81403310]
  3. Key Discipline Fund of College of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Hebei Medical University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study is mainly to explore the mechanism that how Qigesan (QGS) affects the movement capacity of esophageal cancer (EC) cell. QGS incubates ECA109 and TE1 cell lines and detecting the motility of tumor cells by different experiments. Growth arrest-specific 6 (Gas6) and Anexelekto (Axl) were co-localized, and then detecting Gas6, Axl signaling pathway, and protein expression after QGS intervention. Similarly, Observing the signal localization and protein expression of P-phosphoinositide3-kinases (PI3K), P-AKT protein kinase B (AKT), P-nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B), matrixmetalloproteinase-2 (MMP2), and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP9). The results showed that the concentration of QGS was less than 200 ug/ml, and the cultured cells did not exceed 24 h, that no obvious cytotoxicity was observed. QGS significantly inhibited the mobility of ECA109 and TE1 cell lines in the concentration-dependent manner. In addition, QGS can regulate the Gas6/Axl pathway, inhibit the formation and localization of the Gas6/Axl complex, and reduce the protein activation of PI3K/AKT, NF-kappa B, MMP2, and MMP9. Experimental innovation shows that QGS can significantly slow down the mobility of EC cells by regulating the Gas6/Axl complex and downstream signaling pathways, and provides a theoretical basis for the pharmacological effects of QGS in the therapy of EC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available