4.3 Article

Observational constraints on the tilted flat-XCDM and the untilted nonflat XCDM dynamical dark energy inflation parameterizations

Journal

ASTROPHYSICS AND SPACE SCIENCE
Volume 364, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10509-019-3567-3

Keywords

Cosmological parameters; Cosmic background radiation; Large; Scale structure of universe; Inflation; Observations; Methods: statistical

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2017R1D1A1B03028384]
  2. DOE [DE-SC0019038]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1D1A1B03028384] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We constrain tilted spatially-flat and untilted nonflat XCDM dynamical dark energy inflation parameterizations using Planck 2015 cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropy data and recent baryonic acoustic oscillations distance measurements, Type Ia supernovae data, Hubble parameter observations, and growth rate measurements. Inclusion of the four non-CMB data sets results in a significant strengthening of the evidence for nonflatness in the nonflat XCDM model from 1.1 sigma for the CMB data alone to 3.4 sigma for the full data combination. In this untilted nonflat XCDM case the data favor a spatially-closed model in which spatial curvature contributes a little less than a percent of the current cosmological energy budget; they also mildly favor dynamical dark energy over a cosmological constant at 1.2 sigma. These data are also better fit by the flat-XCDM parameterization than by the standard CDM model, but only at 0.3 sigma significance. Current data is unable to rule out dark energy dynamics. The nonflat XCDM parameterization is compatible with the Dark Energy Survey limits on the present value of the rms mass fluctuations amplitude (sigma 8) as a function of the present value of the nonrelativistic matter density parameter (m). However, it does not provide as good a fit to the higher multipole CMB temperature anisotropy data as does the standard tilted flat-CDM model. A number of measured cosmological parameter values differ significantly when determined using the tilted flat-XCDM and the nonflat XCDM parameterizations, including the baryonic matter density parameter and the reionization optical depth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available