4.7 Article

Numerical investigation of the natural convective heat loss of a solar central cavity receiver with air curtain

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 152, Issue -, Pages 147-159

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.02.087

Keywords

Heat losses; Cavity receiver; Air curtain; Natural convection; Inclination

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51506173, 51706168]
  2. Key Research Project of Shaanxi Province [2017ZDXM-GY-017]
  3. Yulin Science and Technology Project [2017KJJH-03]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Creative Team Plan in Xi'an Jiaotong University) [cxtd2017004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Central receiver in a solar tower power system absorbs the solar energy and transfers heat to the working fluid. It is of great importance to reduce the heat losses of the receiver. In the present work, a plane air nozzle was installed on top of a solar cavity receiver in order to create an air curtain. The effects of air curtain on the natural convection of the cavity receiver were numerically analyzed. Four parameters of the air nozzle, including the inclination (theta(noz)) the width (L-noz), the outlet temperature (T-o, (noz)) and the outlet velocity (u(o), (noz)), were considered as the factors. The results indicate that the air curtain could effectively prevent the hot air from flowing out of the cavity. It can enlarge the stagnation zone inside the cavity and suppress the natural convection on the internal surfaces. The convective heat loss monotonically decreases with increasing theta(noz). The downward facing (theta(noz) = 90 degrees) air nozzle produced the highest drop in the convective heat loss. A reduction of 28.6% can be achieved when a downward facing nozzle with 600 mm in width is used. The optimal u(o), (noz) decreases with increasing L-noz.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available