4.8 Article

Impacts of carbon price level in carbon emission trading market

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 239, Issue -, Pages 157-170

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.194

Keywords

CO2 emission; Emission Trading Scheme (ETS); ETS price; Energy consumption; Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model

Funding

  1. Xiamen University - Newcastle University Joint Strategic Partnership Fund
  2. Grant for Collaborative Innovation Center for Energy Economics and Energy Policy [1260Z0210011]
  3. Xiamen University Flourish Plan Special Funding [1260-Y07200]
  4. Ministry of Education of China [10JBG013]
  5. China National Social Science Fund [17AZD013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The problems of excessive CO2 emissions and global warming caused by human activities are becoming more and more severe. Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) may be an effective mean of combating global warming. However, little research focuses on the influence of ETS price on energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and the economy. This paper analyzes the impact of different ETS price level by applying a dynamic recursive Computable General Equilibrium model. The results show that GDP will reduce more with increasing ETS price level. The output of energy industries is more sensitive to ETS price than other industries. Higher ETS price, lower marginal reduction of fossil energy consumption of ETS price. Moreover, low ETS prices will undermine the capacity of the carbon market to reduce emissions. Higher ETS price will lead to a higher reduction in CO2 emission, but the economic costs cannot be ignored. Therefore, this paper argues that ETS prices in China's ETS pilot cities are too low, and would provide little emission reduction. Maintaining EIS prices at $10 and gradually increasing carbon price to $20 is suggested in this paper. Also, we should focus on the appropriate subsidies for new energy generation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available