4.6 Article

Late Neo-Aortic Valve Regurgitation Long After Arterial Switch Operation

Journal

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
Volume 108, Issue 4, Pages 1210-1216

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.04.009

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. The purpose of this study is to assess risk factors of neo-aortic regurgitation (AR) after an arterial switch operation and outcomes of neo-aortic valve surgery. Methods. This is a retrospective study of 469 hospital survivors after arterial switch operation from 1982 to 2016. Preoperative diagnoses included 285 transpositions of the great arteries with intact septum, 140 transpositions with ventricular septal defect, and 44 double-outlet right ventricles. More than mild preoperative pulmonary regurgitation was found in 15 patients. Median age at the operation was 1.0 months (range, 0.1-81.5). Concomitant relief of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction was performed in 20 patients. Seventy-seven patients had more than mild neo-AR at hospital discharge. Results. More than moderate neo-AR was found in 41 patients (8.6%) at a median follow-up of 19.0 years (range, 0.1-35.2). Multivariate analysis identified more than mild preoperative pulmonary regurgitation, concomitant relief of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, and more than mild neo-AR at hospital discharge as risk factors for late neo-AR. Seventeen patients (3.6%) underwent neo-aortic valve surgeries, including 11 aortic valve replacements, 3 aortic valve plasties, 2 Konno procedures, and 1 aortic root replacement, with median age at the neo-aortic valve surgery of 16.5 years (range, 6.2-27.3). There were 2 late deaths and 5 reoperations to the neoaortic valve in 4 patients. Conclusions. Concomitant relief of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and preoperative more than mild pulmonary regurgitation increase the risk of neo-AR after the arterial switch operation. Reoperation for neo-AR can be done safely. (C) 2019 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available