Patient-reported outcomes in hip resurfacing versus conventional total hip arthroplasty: a register-based matched cohort study of 726 patients

Birmingham Hip Resurfacing vs Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched-Pair Comparison of Clinical Outcomes

(2017) Victor R. Ortiz-Declet et al.   JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY

Return to Sports Activity with Short Stems or Standard Stems in Total HIP Arthroplasty in Patients Less than 50 Years Old

(2016) Nicolandrea Del Piccolo et al.   Hip International

Development and validation of a shared decision-making instrument for health-related quality of life one year after total hip replacement based on quality registries data

(2016) Szilard Nemes et al.   JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

Handling missing data in matched case-control studies using multiple imputation

(2015) Shaun R. Seaman et al.   BIOMETRICS

Do Clinical and Quality of Life Scores Change over Time after Hip Resurfacing?

(2015) Timothy L. Tan et al.   Hip International

A prospective comparative study of cementless total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing in patients under the age of 55 years

(2015) F. S. Haddad et al.   Bone & Joint Journal

Results of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 12 to 15 years

(2014) J. Daniel et al.   Bone & Joint Journal

Can patients return to high-impact physical activities after hip resurfacing? A prospective study

(2013) Julien Girard et al.   INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS

Ignoring the matching variables in cohort studies - when is it valid and why?

(2013) Arvid Sjölander et al.   STATISTICS IN MEDICINE

The outcome of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in patients aged < 50 years up to 14 years post-operatively

(2013) G. S. Matharu et al.   Bone & Joint Journal

Does Impact Sport Activity Influence Total Hip Arthroplasty Durability?

(2012) Matthieu Ollivier et al.   CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH

Patient expectations of arthroplasty of the hip and knee

(2012) C. E. H. Scott et al.   JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME

Failure rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales

(2012) Alison J Smith et al.   LANCET

Total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of patients with arthritis of the hip joint: single centre, parallel group, assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial

(2012) M. L. Costa et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

Results of 3,668 primary total hip replacements for primary osteoarthritis in patients under the age of 55 years

(2011) Keijo T Mäkelä et al.   Acta Orthopaedica

Sports Activity After Short-Stem Hip Arthroplasty

(2011) Florian Schmidutz et al.   AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE

Predictors of Participation in Sports After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

(2011) Daniel H. Williams et al.   CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH

DAGitty

(2011) Johannes Textor et al.   EPIDEMIOLOGY

Five-Year Results of the ASR XL Acetabular System and the ASR Hip Resurfacing System

(2011) Richard N de Steiger et al.   JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME

Out of joint: The story of the ASR

(2011) D. Cohen   BMJ-British Medical Journal

A Systematic Review of Modern Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Resurfacing vs Standard Total Hip Arthroplasty in Active Young Patients

(2010) Yong Jiang et al.   JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY

The Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association

(2009) Leif I Havelin et al.   Acta Orthopaedica

Combining estimates of interest in prognostic modelling studies after multiple imputation: current practice and guidelines

(2009) Andrea Marshall et al.   BMC Medical Research Methodology

Resurfacing is Comparable to Total Hip Arthroplasty at Short-term Followup

(2008) Michael A. Mont et al.   CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH