4.7 Article

Statistical analysis of twin/grain boundary interactions in pure rhenium

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 173, Issue -, Pages 44-51

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.04.051

Keywords

Twins; Rhenium; Deformation; Grain boundaries; Electron backscatter diffraction

Funding

  1. US Office of Naval Research [N00014-11-1-0886]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using electron backscatter diffraction, over 1000 grain boundary/twin interactions were investigated in pure Re after uniaxial compression. Crystallographic factors such as grain boundary disorientation angle, displacement gradient tensor accommodation, and twin plane and shear vector alignment were taken into account as well as the macroscopic Schmid factor. It was found that the crystallographic relationship between coincident twin pairs at grain boundaries fall into two categories. In the first category, the twin pairs satisfied two criteria: the twin plane alignment was maximized across the boundary and the twin variant was kept constant across the boundary. In the second category, comprising approximately 5% of the characterized interactions, twin variant selection appeared to be driven by the macroscopically applied stress state, as resolved by the Schmid factor. In comparison to published results on twin/grain boundary interactions in Mg and Zr, it was found that twins transmit across grain boundaries in Re far more readily, regardless of the grain boundary disorientation angle. This is likely to be a function of the anomalously low twin boundary energy in Re as well as the difference in magnitude of the twinning induced deformation that must be accommodated at the boundary, with the {11 (21) over bar}<11<(26)over bar>> system being dominant in Re and the (10 (12) over bar)<10<(11)over bar>> being dominant in Mg and Zr. (C) 2019 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available