4.8 Article

SO2-Resistant Amine-Containing CO2 Adsorbent with a Surface Protection Layer

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 11, Issue 18, Pages 16586-16593

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b02831

Keywords

CO2 capture; SO2-induced degradation; amine-based solid adsorbent; polyethyleneimine; stability

Funding

  1. Korea CCS R&D Center (KCRC) - Korean government (Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning) [NRF-2014M1A8A1049256]
  2. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2017R1A2B2002346]
  3. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) - Korean government (Ministry of Trade, Industry Energy) [20182010600530]
  4. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20182010600530] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Amine-containing solids are promising adsorbents for CO2 capture, but they suffer from irreversible poisoning by the highly acidic SO2 in flue gas. Here, we demonstrate a facile strategy to inhibit SO2 poisoning. We first prepared an amine-containing adsorbent by impregnating polyethyleneimine (PEI) into porous silica. The PEI located at the external surface of the adsorbent was selectively alkylated with epoxide so that amines were fully converted to tertiary amines. As opposed to that onto primary and secondary amines, SO2 adsorption onto tertiary amines is fully reversible. Therefore, during the flue gas adsorption, SO2 is reversibly captured by the tertiary-amine-rich layer and then desulfurized CO2 is adsorbed onto PEI beneath this layer. The resultant adsorbent showed insignificant loss of CO2 adsorption capacity (8.52%) even after 1000 CO2 adsorption-desorption cycles in the presence of SO ppm SO2, whereas conventional PEI/silica showed severe capacity loss (65.1%) due to irreversible SO2 poisoning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available