4.7 Article

Investigating a chimeric anti-mouse PDGFRα antibody as a radiosensitizer in primary mouse sarcomas

Journal

EBIOMEDICINE
Volume 40, Issue -, Pages 224-230

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.01.046

Keywords

Olaratumab; PDGFR alpha; Radiation; Soft tissue sarcoma

Funding

  1. Eli Lilly and Company

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Olaratumab (LY3012207/IMC-3G3/Lartruvo (TM)) is a fully human monoclonal antibody specific for platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFR alpha). Phase Ib/II trial results of olaratumab plus doxorubicin in adult patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) supported accelerated FDA approval of this regimen. Radiation therapy (RT) is frequently used for high-risk localized STS. However, olaratumab has not been tested with concurrent RT. Here, we evaluate the chimeric anti-mouse PDGFR alpha antibody 1E10Fc as a radiosensitizer in a primary mouse model of STS. Methods: Primary STS were initiated in mice. When tumors reached 70 mm(3), mice were allocated into treatment groups: 1) isotype, 2) 1E10Fc, 3) isotype + RT, 4) 1E10Fc + RT. 1E10Fc or isotype was given biweekly. RT (25 Gy delivered in 5 daily 5 Gy fractions) was initiated on Day 0 with first drug treatment. Tumors were measured 3x per week. Upon reaching 900 mm(3), tumors and lungs were harvested. A two-way ANOVA was performed to compare tumor growth delay. Primary tumors were stained for CD31 and PDGFR alpha and lungs were assessed for micrometastases. A Chi-square test was performed to compare the development of micrometastases in the lungs after treatment with 1E10Fc or isotype. Findings: RT significantly delayed time to tumor quintupling compared to no RT (p < 0.0001) [two-way ANOVA], but no difference in tumor growth was seen between mice receiving isotype or 1E10Fc treatment regardless of concurrent RT. Lower microvessel density was observed in the 1E10Fc + RT group. Fewer mice treated with 1E10Fc had micrometastases, but this difference was not statistically significant (p < 0.09). Interpretation: 1E10Fc did not act as a radiosensitizer in this primary STS model. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available