4.6 Article

Convection Initiation Resulting From the Interaction Between a Quasi-Stationary Dryline and Intersecting Gust Fronts: A Case Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages 2379-2396

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2018JD029832

Keywords

convection initiation; dry line; gust front; squall line; cold vortex; China

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [41425018]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2013CB430104]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the convection initiation (CI) of a high-impact squall line that occurred in central eastern China on 3 June 2009 based on observations and numerical modeling. The CI occurred in a scenario in which a set of intersecting gust fronts, organized in a distinct scalloped pattern, propagated toward an area of enhanced moisture produced by a near-surface convergence line. This convergence line developed in a quasi-stationary dryline zone. The dryline primed the preconvective environment by deepening the moist layer prior to the arrival of the intersecting gust fronts. The onset of CI occurred approximately 30 min after these intersecting gust fronts passed through the CI location, which was on the dry side of the dryline. Although these gust fronts acted as a strong signal for CI potential, CI did not occur along the entire length of the scalloped pattern of the intersecting gust fronts. The exact locations of the initiated convective cells were at the vertices of the scalloped pattern. An idealized simulation using a cloud model was conducted, demonstrating that the vertex regions were characterized by more favorable dynamical conditions for CI compared to the nonvertex regions along the scalloped outflow boundary. The greater CI probability over the vertex region was attributed to the greater magnitudes and larger vertical and horizontal extents of updrafts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available