4.5 Article

Compressed and Crumpled Porous Carbon Electrode for High Volumetric Performance Electrical Double-Layer Capacitors

Journal

ENERGY TECHNOLOGY
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ente.201900209

Keywords

aerosol spray pyrolysis; compressed electrodes; electric double-layer capacitors; porous carbon materials; volumetric energy densities

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1802256, 21773118, 51672128]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20151468, BK20170778]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The 2D carbon sheets have great potential for the construction of compact electrodes with high volumetric performance for electrical double-layer capacitors (EDLCs), by virtue of their excellent electrical conductivity, high exposed surface area, free of interpores, and unimpeded ion-diffusion channels. However, 2D nanosheets restack and aggregate during the preparation processes of electrodes, reducing available surface area, and limiting transport of ions. Herein, a facile and scalable method is presented to prepare highly porous crumple carbon balls (PCCBs) assembled by 2D carbon nanosheets. Such a unique nanostructure endows the PCCB electrode with large electrolyte-accessible surface area and short ion-diffusion pathways even when compressed at 40 MPa. Electrochemical evaluations in 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate (EMIMBF4) electrolyte indicate that the compressed PCCB electrodes still show superior gravimetric (103 F g(-1)) and volumetric capacitances (127 F cm(-3)) at 1 A g(-1). The highest volumetric energy density of symmetrical EDLC based on compressed PCCB-based electrode is 53.9 Wh L-1. This work provides a new direction for the development of high volumetric energy density carbon-based EDLCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available