4.5 Article

The cleaner wrasse outperforms other labrids in ecologically relevant contexts, but not in spatial discrimination

Journal

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
Volume 115, Issue -, Pages 145-155

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.02.022

Keywords

cognition; cooperation; ecological approach; exploration; fish; general intelligence; self-control; spatial discrimination

Funding

  1. Swiss Science Foundation [31003A_153067]
  2. University of Neuchatel
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_153067] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ecological approach to cognition provides a clear prediction regarding cognitive performance: performance should be higher in contexts that are ecologically valid than in invalid contexts. Here, we tested this prediction by comparing juvenile and adult cleaner wrasse, Labroides dimidiatus, with juveniles and adults of five related labrid species. Only the former fully depend on interactions with a large variety of so-called 'client reef fish' for their diet, which involves feeding largely on ectoparasites rather than on preferred client mucus. Our results show that cleaners outperform the other species tested in two contexts that are tightly linked to cognitive challenges during cleaning interactions: the willingness to explore novel objects and the ability to feed against preference in order to increase energy intake. In contrast, all species performed similarly in a spatial discrimination task, which was chosen for its limited ecological relevance to any of the species tested. In conclusion, the cognitive abilities of cleaners seem to be tightly linked to the domain-specific challenges they face in nature. We found no support for the alternative hypothesis that selection for social competence in cleaning interactions leads to domain-general cognitive abilities that also enhance performance in unrelated contexts. (C) 2016 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available