4.6 Article

Agroecological Strategies for Reactivating the Agrarian Sector: The Case of Agrolab in Madrid

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su11041181

Keywords

agricultural landscape; agroecology; ecosystem service; living lab; open farming laboratory; participatory approach; people-nature bond; rural-urban interaction; social innovation

Funding

  1. IMIDRA
  2. Spanish National Institute for Agriculture and Food Research and Technology by Social European Fund (Doc-INIA CCAA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Considering the social and ecological obsolescence of the conventional agricultural model and the crisis faced by rural areas, innovative models based on collective initiatives and agroecological practices are emerging. Here, we present the use of a participatory farming lab as a space to reactivate the agrarian sector in rural and periurban areas of Madrid. The specific objectives of this study are: (1) to describe the project; (2) to identify participants' profiles and motivations and (3) to identify the most socially valued ecosystem services and the actions collectively taken to enhance them. To do so, we have used the living lab conceptual approach and the ecosystem service lens. Data gathering included a combination of qualitative and quantitative techniques, including participant observation, informal and formal meetings, interviews, workshops and surveys. We found a diversity of motivations for enrolling in the program and 20 ecosystem services were selected as socially important. We also describe how the project has contributed to adopting agroecological practices to sustain those ecosystem services. Finally, we discuss the contribution of the project towards new and integrated rural development strategies, including its potential to promote cooperative solutions that enhance farming activity by also providing ecosystem services.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available