4.6 Article

Role of Na and Ca as Isovalent Dopants in Cu2ZnSnS4 Solar Cells

Journal

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages 5792-5800

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05348

Keywords

Solar cells; Cu2ZnSnS4; Isovalent doping; Defect formation; Density functional theory

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0002120]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0002120] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A pathway to improve the efficiency of Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS)-based solar cells, which form an important class of beyond-Si, thin-film photovoltaic technology, is the employment of sustainable isovalent dopants (substituting for Cu and Zn) to suppress formation of disorder-inducing, performance-limiting antisite defects. Using calculations based on density functional theory, we examine the influence of Na and Ca as isovalent dopants for Cu and Zn, respectively, on defect formation, thermodynamic stability, and electronic properties of CZTS. On the basis of defect formation energies, we find that Na-doping should be feasible within CZTS while the incorporation of Ca will be difficult. Importantly, both Na and Ca effectively mitigate formation of antisites that cause disorder, if incorporated within the CZTS structure, across doping and Cu-chemical-potential conditions. Thermodynamically, doping high concentrations of Na into CZTS will result in phase separation between CZTS and Na(2)ZnSn(S)4 domains, whereas large additions of Ca will lead to formation of other secondary phases, such as Cu2SnS3 and CaS. With respect to electronic properties, Na (Ca) doping should cause a significant (marginal) increase in the band gap of kesterite CZTS. Overall, we suggest low Na-doping in CZTS as a promising pathway to improve performance of CZTS-based solar cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available