4.3 Article

Parental Perceived Travel Time to and Reported Use of Food Retailers in Association with School Children's Dietary Patterns

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16050824

Keywords

school children; dietary patterns; food environment; perceived travel time; use of food retailers

Funding

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  2. Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation of Brazil (MCTI/CNPq) [014/2011, 483955/2011-6]
  3. CNPq as part of the Science Without Borders Program [233850/2014-7]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Considering the association between the neighborhood food environment and individual eating behaviors, this study aimed to assess the association between parents' reported use of food facilities by their children, and parental perceived travel time to food facilities, with their children's dietary patterns. Parents reported the use of supermarkets, full-service and fast-food restaurants, and perceived travel time to these food retailers. To assess school children's food consumption, a previous day dietary recall was applied. Factor analysis was conducted to identify dietary patterns. To test the association between reported use and perceived travel time to food retailers and school children's dietary patterns, we performed multilevel linear regression analyses. Parents' reported use of supermarkets was associated with children's higher score in the Morning/Evening Meal pattern. The use of full-service and fast-food restaurants was associated with children's higher score in the Fast Food pattern. Higher parental perceived travel time to full-service and fast-food restaurants was associated with children's lower score in the Fast Food pattern. Although the use of full-service and fast-food restaurants was associated with a less healthy dietary pattern, the perception of living further away from these food retailers may pose a barrier for the use of these facilities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available