4.7 Review

On the Shoulders of Giants: Continuing the Legacy of Large-Scale Ecosystem Manipulation Experiments in Puerto Rico

Journal

FORESTS
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/f10030210

Keywords

Luquillo Experimental Forest; tropical; experiments; manipulations; large-scale; Puerto Rico; Caribbean

Categories

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy Terrestrial Ecosystem Sciences Program [DE-SC-0011806, 89243018S-SC-000014]
  2. U.S. Geological Survey
  3. NSF Luquillo Critical Zone Observatory [EAR-1331841]
  4. LTER program [DEB1239764]
  5. NSF [DEB-1457805]
  6. DOE [TES-DE-FOA-0000749]
  7. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, McIntire Stennis project [CA-B-ECO-7673-MS]
  8. USDA Forest Service's International Institute of Tropical Forestry (IITF)
  9. University of Puerto Rico-Rio Piedras

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is a long history of experimental research in the Luquillo Experimental Forest in Puerto Rico. These experiments have addressed questions about biotic thresholds, assessed why communities vary along natural gradients, and have explored forest responses to a range of both anthropogenic and non-anthropogenic disturbances. Combined, these studies cover many of the major disturbances that affect tropical forests around the world and span a wide range of topics, including the effects of forest thinning, ionizing radiation, hurricane disturbance, nitrogen deposition, drought, and global warming. These invaluable studies have greatly enhanced our understanding of tropical forest function under different disturbance regimes and informed the development of management strategies. Here we summarize the major field experiments that have occurred within the Luquillo Experimental Forest. Taken together, results from the major experiments conducted in the Luquillo Experimental Forest demonstrate a high resilience of Puerto Rico's tropical forests to a variety of stressors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available