4.7 Article

Sex Differences Associated With Circulating PCSK9 in Patients Presenting With Acute Myocardial Infarction

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35773-x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A limited number of studies have explored whether the role of circulating proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) in the pathogenesis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is sex specific. The purpose of the present study was to examine sex differences in plasma PCSK9 in Chinese patients with AMI. In this study, a total of 281 records from patients presenting with AMI were analyzed. We compared hospital data and plasma PCSK9 levels by sex difference for inpatients presenting with AMI. After 1 year of follow-up, major adverse cardiac events(MACE) were recorded. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals. We found that, compared with male groups, PCSK9 levels were higher in female patients not only for overall patients with AMI but also for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (median: 273.6 [215.6-366.8] vs. 325.1 [247.5-445.3] ng/ml, P = 0.0136; 273.4 [215.6-369.7] vs. 317.1 [249.6-450.1], P=0.0275, respectively). The cumulative incidence of cardiac death and 1-year MACE were significantly higher in the female group compared with male group (10% vs. 2.74%, P = 0.025; 15% vs. 4.11%, P=0.0054, respectively). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, female sex, total triglyceride, glycosylated hemoglobin A, and homocysteic acid were independent risk factors of 1-year MACE. There was no significant correlation between PCSK9 and 1-year MACE in total AMI patients. In conclusion, PCSK9 levels and 1-year MACE were higher in women with AMI than in men with AMI, however, female sex but not PCSK9 were significant correlated with the 1-year MACE. The clinical implications of this finding are worthy of further investigations and must be confirmed in larger cohorts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available