Multivariate risk prediction tools including MRI for individualized biopsy decision in prostate cancer diagnosis: current status and future directions
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Multivariate risk prediction tools including MRI for individualized biopsy decision in prostate cancer diagnosis: current status and future directions
Authors
Keywords
Prostate cancer (PCa), Biopsy, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), MRI-guided targeted biopsy, PI-RADS, Risk stratification
Journal
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2019-03-14
DOI
10.1007/s00345-019-02707-9
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Determination of Prostate Volume
- (2018) Adam Bezinque et al. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY
- Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Steering Committee: PI-RADS v2 Status Update and Future Directions
- (2018) Anwar R. Padhani et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer: What's Next?
- (2018) Valeria Panebianco et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis
- (2018) Veeru Kasivisvanathan et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Prediction of Prostate Cancer Risk Among Men Undergoing Combined MRI-targeted and Systematic Biopsy Using Novel Pre-biopsy Nomograms That Incorporate MRI Findings
- (2018) Marc A. Bjurlin et al. UROLOGY
- A Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Based Prediction Model for Prostate Biopsy Risk Stratification
- (2018) Sherif Mehralivand et al. JAMA Oncology
- Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study
- (2018) Marloes van der Leest et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study
- (2018) Olivier Rouvière et al. LANCET ONCOLOGY
- Complications After Systematic, Random, and Image-guided Prostate Biopsy
- (2017) Marco Borghesi et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- What Is the Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Prostate Cancer at Biopsy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel
- (2017) Paul C. Moldovan et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer—Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies
- (2017) Jan Philipp Radtke et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- The Value of PSA Density in Combination with PI-RADS™ for the Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Prediction
- (2017) Florian A. Distler et al. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study
- (2017) Hashim U Ahmed et al. LANCET
- Toward an MRI-based nomogram for the prediction of transperineal prostate biopsy outcome: A physician and patient decision tool
- (2017) Su-Min Lee et al. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
- Developing a nomogram based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for forecasting high-grade prostate cancer to reduce unnecessary biopsies within the prostate-specific antigen gray zone
- (2017) Xiang-ke Niu et al. BMC MEDICAL IMAGING
- Could Magnetic Resonance Imaging Help to Identify the Presence of Prostate Cancer Before Initial Biopsy? The Development of Nomogram Predicting the Outcomes of Prostate Biopsy in the Chinese Population
- (2016) Dong Fang et al. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
- The influence of prostate-specific antigen density on positive and negative predictive values of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect Gleason score 7-10 prostate cancer in a repeat biopsy setting
- (2016) Nienke L. Hansen et al. BJU INTERNATIONAL
- Combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density predicts biopsy outcome in prostate biopsy naïve patients
- (2016) Satoshi Washino et al. BJU INTERNATIONAL
- Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans
- (2016) Arnout R. Alberts et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Is the Ellipsoid Formula the New Standard for 3-Tesla MRI Prostate Volume Calculation without Endorectal Coil?
- (2016) Matthias Haas et al. UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS
- Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up
- (2014) Fritz H Schröder et al. LANCET
- Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator 2.0 for the Prediction of Low- vs High-grade Prostate Cancer
- (2014) Donna P. Ankerst et al. UROLOGY
- Optimization of Initial Prostate Biopsy in Clinical Practice: Sampling, Labeling and Specimen Processing
- (2013) Marc A. Bjurlin et al. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- Contemporary pathologic characteristics and oncologic outcomes of prostate cancers missed by 6- and 12-core biopsy and diagnosed with a 21-core biopsy protocol
- (2011) Idir Ouzaid et al. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- Assessing the Performance of Prediction Models
- (2009) Ewout W. Steyerberg et al. EPIDEMIOLOGY
- A Risk-Based Strategy Improves Prostate-Specific Antigen–Driven Detection of Prostate Cancer
- (2009) Monique J. Roobol et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- A graphical device to represent the outcomes of a logistic regression analysis
- (2008) Ries Kranse et al. PROSTATE
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started