4.7 Article

Use of carbon supports with copper ion as a highly sensitive non-enzymatic glucose sensor

Journal

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
Volume 282, Issue -, Pages 187-196

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2018.10.164

Keywords

Glucose; Sensor; Copper ion; Graphite; Activated carbon; Carbon paper; MWCNT

Funding

  1. Innovation and Technology Commission of Hong Kong
  2. Hong Kong Polytechnic University [G-YBSZ, 1-BE0Y]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nearly all current non-enzymatic electrochemical glucose sensors involve carefully designed metal/metal oxide nanomaterials and the complications of preparing electrocatalyst increase the fabrication cost and reduce the reproducibility of a sensor. Thus, a simple yet reliable and cost-effective glucose sensing system is much desired. Inspired by the glucose oxidation mechanism of copper-based nanomaterials, we developed a series of highly sensitive electrochemical glucose sensors using micromol level Cu2+ ions as an electrocatalyst. High sensitivities are achieved on various carbon-based electrodes (GCE: 614 mA M-1 cm(-2); activated carbon: 1627 mA M-1 cm(-2); carbon paper: 2149 mA M-1 cm(-2); graphite powder: 1695 mA M-1 cm(-2), and functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotube: 1842 mA M-1 cm(-2)). With short response time ( < 2 s), large linear range (0.02 mu M-2.5 mM and 2.5-8.0 mM), high stability, and excellent tolerance to interference, Cu ion-based sensor was also validated for testing glucose level in real blood samples. Further studies show that carbon support (e.g., MWCNT-COOH) can be doped with nanomolar level Cu2+ to produce a practical solid electrode with an ultra-high sensitivity of 1732 mA M-1 cm(-2), retaining the advantage of atomic efficiency. This work provides a new route to the rational design of simple, cheap, and highly effective electrochemical glucose sensors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available