4.7 Review

Should we screen for frailty in primary care settings? A fresh perspective on the frailty evidence base: A narrative review

Journal

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Volume 119, Issue -, Pages 63-69

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.12.020

Keywords

Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Frailty; Geriatric assessment; Mass screening; Primary health care; Family practice; General practice

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  2. Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty and Healthy Ageing [GNT 1102208]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With older adults living longer, health service providers have increasingly turned their attention towards frailty and its significant consequences for health and well-being. Consequently, frailty screening has gained momentum as a possible health policy answer to the question of what can be done to prevent frailty's onset and progression. However, who should be screened for frailty, where and when remains a subject of extensive debate. The purpose of this narrative review is to explore the dimensions of this question with reference to Wilson and Jungner's time-tested and widely accepted principles for acceptable screening within community settings. Although the balance of the emerging evidence to support frailty screening is promising, significant gaps in the evidence base remain. Consequently, when assessed against Wilson and Jungner's principles, extensive population screening does not appear to be supported by the evidence. However, screening for the purpose of case-finding may prove useful among older adults.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available