4.7 Article

Galactomannan-carnauba wax coating improves the antioxidant status and reduces chilling injury of 'Paluma' guava

Journal

POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 149, Issue -, Pages 9-17

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.11.013

Keywords

Galactomannan; Antioxidant; Respiration; Ripening; Carnauba

Funding

  1. Fundacao Cearense de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico-FUNCAP, Brazil
  2. Rede Nordeste de Biotecnologia-RENORBIO, Brazil
  3. Instituto Nacional de Frutos Tropicais-INCT/CNPq, Brazil

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Physiologically mature 'Paluma' guava were treated with galactomannan (0.75%) and carnauba wax (0.9%) coaling, stored at ambient (25 degrees C) and refrigerated (11 degrees C), and evaluated every 3rd day for postharvest quality and physiology. Ambient uncoated fruit were apt for consumption for only nine days; meanwhile, coated guavas were acceptable for 15 d with climacteric respiratory peak of 168.6 mg kg(-1) h(-1) at day 12, and firmness of 14.3 N attributed to lower lipid peroxidation and cell wall hydrolysis. Coaling increased antioxidant enzymes SOD and CAT activities that led to 35% lower hydrogen peroxide content, when compared to uncoated control. Coaling prevented guava degreening by inhibiting chlorophyll degradation with content of 45.05 mg kg(-1), lower carotenoid content with 27.8 mg kg(-1) and PPO activity, under refrigeration for 15 d. Refrigerated uncoated fruit exhibited as symptoms of chilling injury inhibition of softening and respiratory peak. Principal component analysis showed that coaling and refrigeration treatment maintains guava quality for 15 d of storage similar to observed for control, at day zero. In conclusion, galactomannan-carnauba wax coaling improved guava postharvest quality through maintenance of firmness and color, besides preventing chilling symptoms under refrigeration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available