4.3 Article

Comparing total mercury concentrations of northern Dolly Varden, Salvelinus malma malma, in two Canadian Arctic rivers 1986-1988 and 2011-2013

Journal

POLAR BIOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages 865-876

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00300-019-02476-6

Keywords

Climate change; Mercury contamination; Salvelinus malma malma; Stable isotopes; Temporal change

Funding

  1. Fisheries Joint Management Committee (FJMC)
  2. NSERC
  3. Inuvialuit/Fisheries and Ocean Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Given the importance of anadromous Northern Dolly Varden as a consumption staple for northern residents and the climate- and development-related impacts on total mercury (THg) concentrations, temporal changes in northern Dolly Varden THg concentrations were assessed between historical (1986-1988) and contemporary (2011-2013) periods from two rivers in the north-western Canadian Arctic. In the Rat River, mean THg changed from 79 +/- 42ng/g ww in 1986-1988 to 109 +/- 44ng/g ww in 2011-2013, while in the Firth River, THg changed from 126 +/- 45ng/g ww in 1986-1988 to 178 +/- 47ng/g ww in 2011-2012. Length adjusted values indicated increases in the Firth River were driven by the increased size of fish, but increases in the Rat River were not. After factoring in size, C-13 and N-15, [THg] was found to be most influenced over time by fish size, but also significantly modified by temporal period and foodweb position. Relationships between log[THg] versus fork-length and log[THg] versus C-13 have remained constant over time in the Rat River, but not in the Firth River, while relationships between log[THg] versus N-15 have remained constant in the Firth River, but not in the Rat River. Changes in the significance and the slope of the relationships relating C-13 and N-15 to log[THg] suggests underlying bioaccumulative processes are temporally variant and will be sensitive to climate-driven changes in the aquatic environments within which fish live and feed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available