4.7 Article

Coadministration of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) and caffeine in low dose ameliorates obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in obese rats

Journal

PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 1019-1026

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ptr.6295

Keywords

caffeine; EGCG; epigallocatechin-3-gallate; green tea; nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; obesity

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018 M632962]
  2. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People's Republic of China [CARS-19]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2017YFD0400803]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) and caffeine in tea exert anti-obesity effects and induces nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) amelioration. However, previous studies usually performed a high-dose EGCG administration, whereas the insecurity was arisen in recent researches. In this study, we treated obese rats with an elaborate dose40mg/kg EGCG, 20mg/kg caffeine, and the coadministration of them as low dose, which were similar to the daily intake; 160mg/kg EGCG as high dose, which was the maximum safe dose had touched the contentious edge. The results suggested that the coadministration of EGCG and caffeine exerted more remarkable function on suppressing body weight gain, reducing white adipose tissue weight and decreasing the energy intake than single use. This may be due to the variation in serum lipid profile, oxidative stress, and adipose-derived and inflammatory cytokines. The pathological micrographs showed long-term high-fat diets caused severe NAFLD, but it was ameliorated at different levels by all of the administrations. In summary, low dose of EGCG or caffeine only showed a mild effect of anti-obesity and NAFLD amelioration. The coadministration of them could exert a superior curative effect as well as high dose EGCG but no anxiety regarding safety.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available