4.7 Review

A high-bias, low-variance introduction to Machine Learning for physicists

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2019.03.001

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Simon's Foundation
  2. NIH MIRA program [1R35GM119461]
  3. Emergent Phenomena in Quantum Systems initiative of the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  4. ERC synergy grant UQUAM
  5. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research, Quantum Algorithm Teams Program
  6. NIH [GM098875-02]
  7. NSF [PHYD1066293]
  8. National Science Foundation [NSF PHY-1748958]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Machine Learning (ML) is one of the most exciting and dynamic areas of modern research and application. The purpose of this review is to provide an introduction to the core concepts and tools of machine learning in a manner easily understood and intuitive to physicists. The review begins by covering fundamental concepts in ML and modern statistics such as the bias-variance tradeoff, overfitting, regularization, generalization, and gradient descent before moving on to more advanced topics in both supervised and unsupervised learning. Topics covered in the review include ensemble models, deep learning and neural networks, clustering and data visualization, energy-based models (including MaxEnt models and Restricted Boltzmann Machines), and variational methods. Throughout, we emphasize the many natural connections between ML and statistical physics. A notable aspect of the review is the use of Python Jupyter notebooks to introduce modern ML/statistical packages to readers using physics-inspired datasets (the Ising Model and Monte-Carlo simulations of supersymmetric decays of proton proton collisions). We conclude with an extended outlook discussing possible uses of machine learning for furthering our understanding of the physical world as well as open problems in ML where physicists may be able to contribute. (C) 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available