4.5 Article

Compare study between icephobicity and superhydrophobicity

Journal

PHYSICA B-CONDENSED MATTER
Volume 556, Issue -, Pages 118-130

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2018.12.014

Keywords

Surface and interface; Icing; Adhesion work; Wetting; Microstructure

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Technology Department of Guizhou Province [LH[2015]7741, J[2014]2147]
  2. Dr. Special Fund of Kaili University [BS201329]
  3. Major Science and Technology 125 Project of Guizhou Province [[2014]037]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although surface microstructures is the key to superhydrophobicity, and possibly leads to significant icephobicity when a water droplet freezes on superhydrophobic surfaces (SHS), thermodynamic mechanisms responsible for the icephobicity and anti-icing still need to be further studied. For this reason, we established the relationships between some quantities, i.e., contact angle (CA) together hysteresis (CAH), adhesion work and the microstructures by a three-dimension (3-D) surface model, and theoretically explained the anti-icing and icephobicity from the SHS. Our theoretical and experimental study indicate, the adhesion work (W-ai) of a frozen water droplet to the SHS in composite wetting state (CWS) is apparently less than that in the non-composite wetting state (NCWS). Therefore it is necessary to create such CWS by designing surface micro/nanostructure. Further study also shows, the adhesion work (W-aw) of a water droplet to the SHS is larger than that (W-ai) of their frozen, thus implying decrease of the adhesion work after icing. This will improve on the understanding of the SHS for anti-icing and icephobicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available