4.4 Article

Dementia imaging in clinical practice: a European-wide survey of 193 centres and conclusions by the ESNR working group

Journal

NEURORADIOLOGY
Volume 61, Issue 6, Pages 633-642

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-019-02188-y

Keywords

Imaging; Dementia; MRI; Survey

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeThrough a European-wide survey, we assessed the current clinical practice of imaging in the primary evaluation of dementia, with respect to standardised imaging, evaluation and reporting.MethodsAn online questionnaire was emailed to all European Society of Neuroradiology (ESNR) members (n=1662) and non-members who had expressed their interest in ESNR activities in the past (n=6400). The questionnaire featured 42 individual items, divided into multiple choice, single best choice and free text answers. Information was gathered on the context of the practices, available and preferred imaging modalities, applied imaging protocols and standards for interpretation, reporting and communication.ResultsA total of 193 unique (non-duplicate) entries from the European academic and non-academic institutions were received from a total of 28 countries. Of these, 75% were neuroradiologists, 12% general radiologists and 11% (neuro) radiologists in training. Of responding centres, 38% performed more than five scans/week for suspected dementia. MRI was primarily used in 72% of centres. Over 90% of centres acquired a combination of T2w, FLAIR, T1w, DWI and T2*w sequences. Visual rating scales were used in 75% of centres, most often the Fazekas and medial temporal atrophy scale; 32% of respondents lacked full confidence in their use. Only 23% of centres performed volumetric analysis. A minority of centres (28%) used structured reports.ConclusionsCurrent practice in dementia imaging is fairly homogeneous across Europe, in terms of image acquisition and image interpretation. Hurdles identified include training on the use of visual rating scales, implementation of volumetric assessment and structured reporting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available