4.7 Article

Microfluidic reprogramming to pluripotency of human somatic cells

Journal

NATURE PROTOCOLS
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 722-737

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41596-018-0108-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [31601178]
  2. ShanghaiTech University
  3. University of Padova (TRANSAC)
  4. University of Padova (PRAT)
  5. CaRiPaRo Foundation
  6. Telethon Foundation [GGP15275]
  7. Oak Foundation Award [W1095/OCAY-14-191]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) have a number of potential applications in stem cell biology and regenerative medicine, including precision medicine. However, their potential clinical application is hampered by the low efficiency, high costs, and heavy workload of the reprogramming process. Here we describe a protocol to reprogram human somatic cells to hiPSCs with high efficiency in 15 d using microfluidics. We successfully downscaled an 8-d protocol based on daily transfections of mRNA encoding for reprogramming factors and immune evasion proteins. Using this protocol, we obtain hiPSC colonies (up to 160 +/- 20 mean +/- s.d (n = 48)) in a single 27-mm(2) microfluidic chamber) 15 d after seeding similar to 1,500 cells per independent chamber and under xeno-free defined conditions. Only similar to 20 mu L of medium is required per day. The hiPSC colonies extracted from the microfluidic chamber do not require further stabilization because of the short lifetime of mRNA. The high success rate of reprogramming in microfluidics, under completely defined conditions, enables hundreds of cells to be simultaneously reprogrammed, with an similar to 100-fold reduction in costs of raw materials compared to those for standard multiwell culture conditions. This system also enables the generation of hiPSCs suitable for clinical translation or further research into the reprogramming process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available