4.3 Article

Fabrication and improvement of PCL/alginate/PAAm scaffold via selective laser sintering for tissue engineering

Journal

MICRO & NANO LETTERS
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages 852-855

Publisher

INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET
DOI: 10.1049/mnl.2018.5806

Keywords

laser sintering; tissue engineering; porous materials; elastic moduli; bone; elongation; biomedical materials; cellular biophysics; biological tissues; elasticity; polymer blends; selective laser sintering; tissue engineering; porous polycaprolactone scaffolds; critical processing parameters; experiment mechanical property assessment; PCL-alginate-polyacrylamide scaffold; cell seeding; in vitro culture; cell viability; SLS technique; skeletal tissue repair; elastic modulus

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61603002]
  2. 973 Project [2014CB931804]
  3. 111 Projects [B07033]
  4. NSFC-CAS Joint Fund [U1332130]
  5. Key Research and Development Program of Anhui [1704a0902051]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, porous polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds were designed and fabricated using selective laser sintering (SLS). The critical processing parameters of the SLS for PCL were optimised. This work post-processed these PCL scaffolds to produce PCL/alginate/polyacrylamide (PAAm) scaffolds to improve their performance. The experiment mechanical property assessment showed that the sample's average elastic modulus increases from 6.99 MPa (PCL) to 12.67 MPa (PCL/alginate/PAAm), and the elongation at break of samples increases from 59% (PCL) to 112.9% (PCL/alginate/PAAm). Cell seeding and in vitro culture showed that cell viability remained above 94% over 5 days. Thus, the current study suggests that a promising strategy for the improvement of the characteristics of PCL/alginate/PAAm scaffolds and advances the potential application of SLS technique towards skeletal tissue repair.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available