4.5 Article

Pancreatic progenitor cell differentiation and proliferation factor predicts poor prognosis in heptaocellular carcinoma

Journal

MEDICINE
Volume 98, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014552

Keywords

hepatocellular carcinoma; pancreatic progenitor cell differentiation and proliferation factor; prognosis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science foundation of China [81502372]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Youth Fund) [BK20130475]
  3. Jiangsu Provincial Medical Youth Talent [QNRC2016838, QNRC2016839]
  4. Zhenjiang Science and Technology Pillar Program [SH2014035]
  5. Foundation for Young Scientists of affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University [JDFYRC2013009, JDFYRC2016002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study is to investigate the expression of pancreatic progenitor cell differentiation and proliferation factor (PPDPF) and its relationship with clinicopathological factors in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A total of 135 patients diagnosed with HCC who underwent curative surgery were enrolled in this study. The expression of PPDPF was examined by real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), western blot, and immunohistochemistry. The prognostic value for each sample was explored. Both RT-PCR and western blot revealed PPDPF expression was upregulated in HCC. Higher PPDPF expression was also observed in HCC (54.07%) detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC), which was significantly associated with tumors size (P = .003), Edmondson-Steiner Grading (P = .021), recurrence (P = .010), and Diolame complete (P = .023). Patients with higher PPDPF expression had increased cancer progression and poorer prognosis than those with lower expression (P = .043). Multivariate analysis indicated PPDPF as an independent prognostic factor (P = .014). Aberrance PPDPF expression might be a useful predictor and could serve as a potential therapeutic target for HCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available