4.5 Article

Septic patients presenting with apparently normal C-reactive protein A point of caution for the ER physician

Journal

MEDICINE
Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013989

Keywords

C-reactive protein; immunosuppression; sepsis; velocity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The presentation of septic patients with low C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations to the emergency room (ER) might convey an erroneous impression regarding the severity of the disease. We analyzed a retrospective study of septic patients admitted to the internal medicine departments of a relatively large tertiary medical center, following admission to the ER. These patients had CRP concentrations of <31.9mg/L, the determined cut-off for CRP concentrations in a large cohort of apparently healthy individuals in the community (n=17,214, upper limit of mean +3 standard deviations). By processing the electronic medical records, we found 2724 patients with a diagnosis of sepsis, 476 of whom had an admission CRP concentration of <31.9 mg/L. Following further analysis of these records, we found that 34 of the 175 patients (19.4%) who fulfilled the definition of sepsis, died within 1 week of hospitalization. Of special interest was the finding that within <24h, a significant increment from a median CRP of 16.1mg/L (IQR 7.9-22.5) to 58.6mg/L (IQR 24.2-134.4), (P<.001) was noted, accompanied by a velocity change from 0.4 +/- 0.29 to 8.3 +/- 24.2 mg/L/h following antibiotic administration (P<.001). ER physicians should take into consideration that septic patients with a high in-hospital mortality rate can present with CRP concentrations that are within the range observed in apparently healthy individuals in the community. A second CRP test obtained within 24h following antibiotic administration might influence attitudes regarding the severity of the disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available