4.7 Article

Non-invasive determination of glucose directly in raw fruits using a continuous flow system based on microdialysis sampling and amperometric detection at an integrated enzymatic biosensor

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 914, Issue -, Pages 53-61

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2016.02.015

Keywords

Microdialysis sampling; Raw fruits; Continuous flow system; Amperometric detection; Glucose enzymatic biosensor

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad Research Project [CTQ2015-64402-C2-1-R]
  2. NANOAVANSENS Program from the Comunidad de Madrid [S2013/MT-3029]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A non-destructive, rapid and simple to use sensing method for direct determination of glucose in non-processed fruits is described. The strategy involved on-line microdialysis sampling coupled with a continuous flow system with amperometric detection at an enzymatic biosensor. Apart from direct determination of glucose in fruit juices and blended fruits, this work describes for the first time the successful application of an enzymatic biosensor-based electrochemical approach to the non-invasive determination of glucose in raw fruits. The methodology correlates, through previous calibration set-up, the amperometric signal generated from glucose in non-processed fruits with its content in % (w/w). The comparison of the obtained results using the proposed approach in different fruits with those provided by other method involving the same commercial biosensor as amperometric detector in stirred solutions pointed out that there were no significant differences. Moreover, in comparison with other available methodologies, this microdialysis-coupled continuous flow system amperometric biosensor-based procedure features straightforward sample preparation, low cost, reduced assay time (sampling rate of 7 h(-1)) and ease of automation. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available