4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Distinct Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Prognosis Based on the Presence of Ground Glass Opacity Component in Clinical Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 265-275

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.09.026

Keywords

Lung adenocarcinoma; ground glass opacity; diagnosis; survival analysis

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan
  2. National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund [26-A-4]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: We evaluated differences in the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis based on the presence of ground glass opacity (GGO) components in small-sized lung adenocarcinoma. Methods: We retrospectively investigated 634 lung adenocarcinomas classed as c-stage IA in the eighth edition TNM classification. Staging was defined according to the solid component size measured by thin-section computed tomography. All tumors were grouped into either a GGO or solid group, based on the presence of a GGO component. Results: Of the cases, 215 (34%) were classed as c-stage IA1 (T1mi: 88, T1a-GGO: 102, T1a-solid: 25), 255 (40%) as c-stage IA2 (T1b-GGO: 122, T1b-solid: 133), and 164 (26%) as c-stage IA3 (T1c-GGO: 44, T1c-solid: 120). Among the 546 c-stage IA cases excluding the T1mi lesions, Cox regression analysis revealed that presence of GGO was an independently significant prognosticator (p = 0.024). The result was validated in 494 c-stage IA lung adenocarcinomas with a nonpredominant GGO component, showing the presence of GGO as a significant prognosticator (p = 0.048). When we evaluated the prognostic impact of GGOpresence in each clinical stage, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was significantly different between the GGO and solid groups (IA1: 97.8% versus 86.6%, p = 0.026; IA2: 89.3% versus 75.2%, p = 0.007; IA3: 88.5% versus 62.3%, p = 0.003). Furthermore, the 5-year overall survival b was distinct in parallel similar pathologic findings when comparing a lepidic versus an invasive component (IA1: 97.9% versus 85.6%, p = 0.031; IA2: 86.1% versus 69.4%, p = 0.007; IA3: 77.5% versus 55.8%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Clinicopathologic and oncologic outcomes were disparate based on the presence of a GGO component in the eighth edition TNM classification of c-stage IA lung adenocarcinoma. (C) 2018 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available