4.2 Article

Effect of ursodeoxycholic acid in facilitating early hepatic clearance of radiotracer among patients undergoing 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: A randomized double blind placebo controlled parallel trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 2337-2348

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-019-01597-z

Keywords

Tc-99m-MIBI; Adenosine stress; Viability; MPS; SPECT; CT; UDCA (ursodeoxycholic acid); Liver clearance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Infra-cardiac tracer activity due to persistent hepatic activity interferes in inferior and infero-septal wall assessment during Tc-99m-MIBI SPECT/CT myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) in evaluation of patients with coronary artery disease. It affects image interpretation with increased study duration. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is known to enhance hepatic excretion of bilirubin and bile salts, though its role in enhancing the hepatic tracer clearance in facilitating cardiac imaging is not known. Methods This prospective, randomized double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial of 120 patients, referred for adenosine stress or viability MPS studies were randomized 1:1 to receive either UDCA or placebo. Outcome was quantitative & qualitative improvement in imaging for better interpretation and to reduce the waiting time for scan. Results 118 participants (59 +/- 11.9 years; 84 men) underwent adenosine stress MPS or viability MPS. Sixty participants had UDCA while 58 had placebo intervention. The study showed significant decrease in liver counts with improved myocardial to liver ratio at 30 and 60 minutes in adenosine stress MPS group, and marginally significant alteration in liver counts at 60 minutes in viability MPS group receiving UDCA, resulting in better images. Conclusion UDCA intervention in MPS provides early and better image due to faster hepatic tracer clearance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available