4.7 Article

Efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab in a real-life cohort of patients with multiple sclerosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 266, Issue 6, Pages 1405-1411

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-019-09272-6

Keywords

Alemtuzumab; Real-life; Efficacy; Safety

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundNo postmarketing randomised clinical trials are available about alemtuzumab, and real-world data are limited. We aimed to analyse the efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab in a single-centre cohort of patients with relapsing-remitting MS.MethodsPatients who took alemtuzumab were enrolled. We collected the following data: age, sex, MS history, expanded disability status scale (EDSS), relapses, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters after alemtuzumab, and adverse events. EDSS scores before alemtuzumab and at the last follow-up were compared by Wilcoxon test. Time to first relapse was analysed after dividing the cohort on the basis of previous treatment.ResultsNinety patients were enrolled [women 74.4%; naive 7; mean follow-up 27months (SD 23)]. The EDSS was reduced from a median of 2.5 (IQR 1.5-4) before alemtuzumab to 2.0 (IQR 1.5-3.5) after (p=0.025). The time to first relapse was shorter in patients shifting from a second-line therapy (p=0.011). Over 2 years, 43.7% had no evidence of disease activity. We observed infusion-related reactions in 95.5% patients, including 11.1% with pneumonitis, thyroiditis in 11%, and thrombocytopenia in 3.3%.ConclusionsWe confirmed the clinical and MRI efficacy of alemtuzumab in the clinical setting and the frequency of infusion-related reactions. Compared with that in clinical trials, higher number of patients developed pneumonitis during infusion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available